The Journal of Implant & Advanced Clinical Dentistry
Search through the entire journal archive by title, author(First or Last name), or keyword

Maxillary Sinus Lift Material Comparison

  • Journal:Maxillary Sinus Lift Material Comparison Volume: Vol. 2, No. 5 Date: June 2010
    Authors:Eduardo Anitua, DDS, MD, Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS, Douglas Dompkowski, DDS, Sammy S. Noumbissi, DDS MS, Alejandro J. Kleinman, DDS MS

    19. The Use of Short and Extra-Short BTI Implants In the Daily Clinical Practice

    Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival rates of short (7 mm to 8.5 mm) and extra-short BTI implants (5.5 mm and 6.5 mm) installed both in the maxilla and the mandible.

    33. Simplifying Implant Placement with Partially Edentulous Arch Surgical Stents

    Background: Dental implants are a prosthetically driven treatment with a surgical component. It is important to guide the surgical placement so that prosthetics are uncomplicated and predictable. Surgical stents pro- vide communication between the surgeon and restoring dentist so that implant placement is at the ideal prosthetic position and angulation.

    47. A Comparative Clinical, Histological and Histomorphometric Study of Mineralized Allograft and Xenograft Materials in the Treatment of Atrophic Maxillary Sinuses

    Background: Maxillary sinus augmentation with deproteinized mineralized bovine bone xenografts (DMBBX) alone or in combination with demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) has been well documented. Recently, articles have been published evaluating histologically, histomorphometrically, and clinically the efficacy of using human mineralized cortical, cancellous, or a combination of both for atrophic maxillary sinuses. This study clinically, histologically and histomorphometrically compares three graft combinations currently used by practitioners in the augmentation of atrophic human maxillary sinuses.

“One Drill® System” by OsseoFuse ten years clinical follow up!

Recent Issues